簡愛讀后感600字3篇

　　篇一：

　　簡愛生存在一個(gè)寄人籬下的環(huán)境，從小就承受著與同齡人不一樣的待遇，姨媽的嫌棄，表姐的蔑視，表哥的侮辱和毒打……也許正是因?yàn)檫@一切，喚醒了簡愛無限的信心和堅(jiān)強(qiáng)不屈的性格，一種可戰(zhàn)勝的內(nèi)在人格力量。，她堅(jiān)定不移地去追求一種光明的，圣潔的，美好的生活。

　　在羅切斯特的面前，她從不因?yàn)樽约菏且粋€(gè)地位低賤的家庭教師而感到自卑，反而認(rèn)為他們是平等的。也正因?yàn)樗恼?，高尚，純潔，心靈沒有受到世俗社會(huì)的污染，使得羅切斯特為之震撼，并把她看作了一個(gè)可以和自己在精神上平等交談的人，并且深深愛上了她。

　　而當(dāng)他們結(jié)婚的那一天，簡愛知道了羅切斯特已有妻子時(shí)，她覺得自己必須要離開，她雖然講，“我要遵從上帝頒發(fā)世人認(rèn)可的法律，我要堅(jiān)守住我在清醒時(shí)而不是像現(xiàn)在這樣瘋狂時(shí)所接受的原則”.但是從內(nèi)心講，更深一層的是簡愛意識(shí)到自己受到了欺騙，她的自尊心受到了戲弄，因?yàn)樗類壑_切斯特。但簡愛做出了一個(gè)非常理性的決定。在這樣一種愛情力量包圍之下，在富裕的生活誘惑之下，她依然要堅(jiān)持自己作為個(gè)人的尊嚴(yán)，這是簡愛最具有精神魅力的地方。

　　雖然我覺得小說最后的結(jié)局過于完美，甚至這種圓滿本身標(biāo)志著膚淺，但是我依然尊重作者對(duì)這種美好生活的理想——就是尊嚴(yán)+愛，畢竟在當(dāng)今社會(huì)，人們都瘋狂地似乎為了金錢和地位而淹沒愛情。很少有人會(huì)像簡愛這樣為愛情為人格拋棄所有，而且義無反顧?！逗啇邸匪宫F(xiàn)給我是一種返樸歸真，是一種追求全心付出的感覺，它猶如一杯冰水，凈化每一個(gè)讀者的心靈，同時(shí)引起讀者的共鳴。

　　能被你的同伴們所愛，并感覺到自己的到來能給他們?cè)鎏硪环萦鋹?，再?zèng)]什么快樂能與此相比了。

　　暴力不是消除仇恨的最好辦法——同樣，報(bào)復(fù)也絕對(duì)醫(yī)治不了傷害。

　　人的天性就是這樣的不完美!即使是最明亮的行星也有這類黑斑，而斯卡查德小姐這樣的眼睛只能看到細(xì)微的缺陷，卻對(duì)星球的萬丈光芒視而不見。

　　篇二：

　　This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.

　　It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”， it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.

　　Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.

　　I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)

　　What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.

　　Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.

　　In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.

　　Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. Indubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.

　　篇三：

　　《簡愛》是英國文學(xué)史上的一部經(jīng)典傳世之作，它成功地塑造了英國文學(xué)史中第一個(gè)對(duì)愛情、生活、社會(huì)以及宗教都采取了獨(dú)立自主的積極進(jìn)取態(tài)度和敢于斗爭、敢于爭取自由平等地位的女性形象。

　　大凡喜愛外國文學(xué)作品的女性，都喜歡讀夏洛蒂的《簡愛》。如果我們認(rèn)為夏洛蒂僅僅只為寫這段纏綿的愛情而寫《簡愛》。我想，錯(cuò)了。作者也是一位女性，生活在波動(dòng)變化著的英國19世紀(jì)中葉，那時(shí)思想有著一個(gè)嶄新的開始。而在《簡愛》里滲透最多的也就是這種思想——女性的獨(dú)立意識(shí)。讓我們?cè)囅胍幌拢绻啇鄣莫?dú)立，早已被扼殺在寄人籬下的童年生活里;如果她沒有那份獨(dú)立，她早已和有妻女的羅切斯特生活在一起，開始有金錢，有地位的新生活;如果她沒有那份純潔，我們現(xiàn)在手中的《簡愛》也不再是令人感動(dòng)的流淚的經(jīng)典。所以，我開始去想，為什么《簡愛》讓我們感動(dòng)，愛不釋手——就是她獨(dú)立的性格，令人心動(dòng)的人格魅力。

　　然而，我們不禁要問，僅這一步就能獨(dú)立嗎?我認(rèn)為，不會(huì)的。畢竟女性的獨(dú)立是一個(gè)長期的過程，不是一蹴而就的。它需要一種徹底的勇氣，就像簡愛當(dāng)年毅然離開羅切斯特一樣，需要“風(fēng)瀟瀟兮易水寒，壯土一去兮不復(fù)返”的豪邁和膽量。我想，這應(yīng)該才是最關(guān)鍵的一步，也應(yīng)該是走向獨(dú)立的決定性的一步。而夏洛蒂筆下的簡愛卻把她倔強(qiáng)的性格，獨(dú)立的個(gè)性留給我們一個(gè)感動(dòng)。所以她是成功的，幸福的女性。

　　簡愛已作為獨(dú)立女性的經(jīng)典，我希望陽光下，鮮花里有更多的簡愛走出來，不管是貧窮，還是富有;不管是美貌，還是相貌平庸，都有美好的心靈和充實(shí)的心胸，都能以獨(dú)立的人格和堅(jiān)強(qiáng)的個(gè)性生活。