GRE考試中，寫作部分的總分值為6分，那么如果作文想要拿到3分的成績，是容易還是難呢?具體的在備考的過程中，同學們應該怎么備考，才能夠拿到GRE寫作3分以上的成績呢?下面小編為大家整理了詳細的內(nèi)容，供大家參考!

GRE作文3分容易考嗎?

在新GRE作文中的另一個普遍問題是寫作速度太慢，這顯然是因為在考試前所作的準備不夠充分。GRE考試的寫作除了開頭段和結尾段，中間一般應該寫三段。但是考生在規(guī)定時間內(nèi)往往只能寫兩段，而且字數(shù)也不夠，只能寫400字左右。GRE寫作雖然沒有字數(shù)要求，但是一篇較好的、成熟的，能夠充分展示自己觀點的GRE作文，一般應在600字左右，或者是600字以上。由此可見，一篇400字左右的文章在內(nèi)容上是不夠充實的。

多準備針對性素材提升論述說服力

在備考過程中要多準備例子，并把它們一一寫下來，進行分類。一個例子往往可以應對好幾個同類的題目，這樣做是效率最高的辦法。

堅持寫作練習克服畏難情緒

我們都害怕寫作文，想到要練習寫一整篇文章，往往就沒有了信心。其實我們可以從練習寫作開頭段，然后設計文章的提綱開始。寫開頭段能夠讓我們以輕松一點的心情著手GRE寫作的準備，并且迅速了解所有的題目，因為GRE的題目數(shù)量是固定的。

儲備積極詞匯，用時得心應手。從備考的開始就要著手增加working vocabulary, 當然也包含詞組，成語。平時背的詞匯往往只是看到它能知道其中文的某個翻譯意思，但是我們卻不能靈活運用這些詞匯進行表達，更不用說在短暫的GRE寫作考試時間內(nèi)用它們遣詞造句了。

ETS官網(wǎng)GRE作文3分范文賞析

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Essay Response — Score 3

There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. For example, the problem of dibilitating illnesses and diseases such as alzheimer's disease is slowing being solved by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing new brain cells and the possibility to reverse the onset of alzheimer's is now becoming a reality. This shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think.

One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds is the use of internet and cell phones. In the past humans had to seek out information in many different enviroments and aspects of life. Now humans can sit in a chair and type anything into a computer and get an answer. Our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularily substituted for other information sources such as human interactions and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.

Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 3

This essay never moves beyond a superficial discussion of the issue. The writer attempts to develop two points: that advancements in technology have progressed our knowledge in many fields and that supplementing rather than relying on technology is "surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race." Each point, then, is developed with relevant but insufficient evidence. In discussing the potential of technology to advance knowledge in many fields (a broad subject, rife with possible examples), the writer uses only one limited and very brief example from a specific field (medicine and stem-cell research).

Development of the second point is hindered by a lack of specificity and organization. The writer creates what might be best described as an outline. The writer cites a need for regulation/supplementation and warns of the detriment of over-reliance upon technology. However, the explanation of both the problem and solution is vague and limited ("Our reliance ... can be detrimental. If humans understand that we should not have such a reliance ... we will advance further"). There is neither explanation of consequences nor clarification of what is meant by "supplementing." This second paragraph is a series of generalizations that are loosely connected and lack a much-needed grounding.

In the essay, there are some minor language errors and a few more serious flaws (e.g., "The future ability of growing new brain cells" or "One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds"). Despite the accumulation of such flaws, the writer's meaning is generally clear. Thus, this essay earns a score of 3.

GRE作文高分的備考復習經(jīng)驗

第一，文章開始點明中心句。

在每一段開始的第一行，最好能明確地表達你想說什么，也就是中心句。

這做法雖然死板，但往往有奇效。特別是對自己邏輯推理不是很有信心的各位，說清楚了，沒說全面總比說都沒說清楚要好。

第二，寫作這個東西其實是相通的。

我們中的很大一部分在高考結束后恐怕很少再寫這么長的，同時主題又相對深刻的文字。英文只是一個表達方式，而論證過程則和中文沒有任何區(qū)別。如果實在覺得難以上手，不妨先試試寫一篇自己認為很深刻的中文文章看看。在邏輯和思想方面，這樣的訓練方式會有奇效，同時對于心理是一個不小的鼓舞。

第三，有關范文。

范文是一定要看的，看什么。我建議，開始的時候，不要糾結于某某單詞的某某用法，大不了你寫的時候不用就是了。要大略的看，看作者是怎么展開題目，從哪幾個方面入手，各自怎么論證的。

很重要的一點是，不要迷信范文。沒有任何證據(jù)表明你看到的這篇范文出自一位邏輯學大師的手，即便確實如此，對于同一問題有不同的見解這是再正常不過的事情。思路可以借鑒，但千萬不要僵化。

與此本質(zhì)相同的另一個方法是，請別人改作文，就觀點改或就文字改，按個人情況取舍。

GRE寫作復習備考書籍參考　　

GRE寫作寶典(第一版)

評注：第一版盡管粗糙，但是素材全，練習好，而且今天的很多重考題都在該書范圍內(nèi)，尤其是占全書1/3之多的“寫作工具箱”是準備寫作的一項利器。

新GRE作文高分書籍參考，《新GRE寫作官方題庫與范文》無疑就是一本攻克GRE作文必備書籍。

《新GRE寫作官方題庫與范文》不僅完整收錄了新G考以來的所有寫作題目，而且撰寫的高度符合官方標準的范文，原汁原味，流暢地道，成為廣大考生的殺G必備!

書中結合ETS公布的最新官方題庫，從考生在備考過程中面臨的實際難題出發(fā)，對于如何寫作Issue和Argument進行了詳細的講解，并為考生精心解讀最新GRE寫作題庫，點撥題目特點，分析成文思路和脈絡。題庫中的每道題目都提供了由美籍教師精心撰寫的高分參考范文，考生可細細研習，學構思、品詞句，體會將學到的技巧運用到實際寫作中去，從而做到舉一反三、觸類旁通。

此外，書中還為考生提供了Issue題庫以及Argument題庫的交叉索引，方便考生查閱。附錄中提供的常用連接詞也可幫助考生在寫作時增強文章的邏輯性，使文章更加連貫流暢。

GRE作文3分容易考嗎相關文章：