GRE考試寫作素材整理。如何做好gre寫作考試的備考?平時(shí)練習(xí)的過(guò)程中，注重積累是必不可少的，下面是為同學(xué)們搜索整理的GRE考試寫作素材。希望對(duì)同學(xué)們的gre 考試有所幫助，下面一起來(lái)看看吧。

GRE寫作例子全方位匯總

1. 教育類

1 教育的目的和作用：Transmitting democratic values; create equality of opportunity; preparing new generations of citizens in society.

2 教育之生活技能：

Logical thinking; analysis; creative problem solving; synthesis; oralcommunication; writing communication; interpersonal; leadership

3 道德教育

Honesty; fairness; self-discipline; fidelity to task, friends and family; personal responsibility; love of a country; belief in the principles of liberty; equality and freedom to practice one’s faith

4 人文教育

an ability to synthesize and relate; to weigh cause and effect; to seeevents in perspective; how to read, write and think; speakintelligently; get along with others; conceptualize problems

5 填鴨教育

2. 科技類

1 帶來(lái)landfill: outdated devices, discarded chemicals, plastic packaging

2 帶來(lái)out of work: automation contribute to out of work; the developmentof computers and transistors and the accompanying trend towardminiaturization

3 壞處：automobile exhausts, pesticides such as DDT threaten the food chain, mineral wastes pollute reservoirs of groundwater

4 好處：telecomuniting: because of the side effect relatively inferior,improve productivity, develop quantity management, reduce laborresourcefulness

5 雙面性：as medicine both have side effect; however, people could not reject to receive them with more benefits

6 事例：國(guó)防軍備，基因治療疾病，機(jī)器人的工業(yè)用途，全球化;事業(yè)，個(gè)人隱私，倫理，社會(huì)不平等，文化落后，文化殖民，溫室效應(yīng)，飲水質(zhì)量數(shù)量，灌溉用水，工業(yè)用水，發(fā)電，漁業(yè)，化學(xué)泄漏，核泄漏導(dǎo)致死亡，疾病

3. 競(jìng)爭(zhēng)類

1 競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的好處：in business: 電腦更先進(jìn)，通訊更發(fā)達(dá)，價(jià)格更低;其他：挑戰(zhàn)人類極限，促進(jìn)學(xué)習(xí)，使社會(huì)民主

2 合作的好處：例子如籃球，建筑，修路;壞處：失去競(jìng)爭(zhēng);過(guò)度：合作壟??政府operate以免失去competition

3 合作競(jìng)爭(zhēng)：co-opetition, a combination of cooperation and competition, is the delicate balance of cooperation and competition.

GRE寫作滿分范文1

"In?our?time,?specialists?of?all?kinds?are?highly?over-rated.?We?need?more?generalists?—?people?who?can?provide?broad?perspectives."??

In?today's?society,?there?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists.?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field,?education,?and?the?work?place.??First,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?medical?field.?A?generalist?in?this?area?would?be?straight?foward?with?clients.?For?instance,?in?explaining?to?a?patient?they?had?cancer.?A?specialist?would?use?wording?that?you?would?believe?everything?is?fine.??

Second,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?education?field.?In?this?field?some?instructors?use?"big?words"?and?try?to?out?smart?themselves?with?there?own?thoughts?of?character.??Last,?I?will?discuss?how?there?is?a?need?for?generalists?in?the?workplace.?In?the?workplace?the?bosses?should?be?open?with?personell.?For?instance,?instead?of?acting?like?they?know?everything?they?should?be?open?to?knew?thoughts?and?ideas.????

COMMENTARY

On?the?surface,?this?essay?appears?to?present?an?organized?discussion?of?the?issue.?In?actuality,?there?are?fundamental?deficiencies?in?analysis?and?development.??

The?essay?begins?with?a?tautology:?"...there?are?many?people?who?feel?generalist?are?more?broad?than?specialists."?Then,?in?the?three?short?paragraphs?that?follow,?the?writer?promises?to?discuss?"a?need?for?generalists"?in?a?specific?field,?but?none?of?these?discussions?materialize.??

The?rest?of?the?essay?only?confirms?the?sense?of?"fundamental?deficiency."?Rather?than?analyze?the?issue,?the?writer?unpersuasively?vilifies?specialists?as?people?who?use?their?power?to?deceive?and?mislead?others.??

Although?the?errors?(sentence?fragments,?incorrect?verb?tenses,?and?awkward?syntax)?are?persistent,?language?problems?alone?do?not?earn?this?essay?a?score?of?"1."?Rather,?this?response?fits?the?scoring?guide?criterion?of?showing?"little?evidence?of?the?ability?to?develop?or?organize?a?coherent?response?to?the?topic."

GRE寫作滿分范文2

"It?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?place?so?much?emphasis?on?finding?out?what?students?want?to?include?in?the?curriculum?and?then?giving?it?to?them.??It?is?the?educators'?duty?to?determine?the?curriculum?and?the?students'?duty?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them."??

The?statement?above?conceals?intesting?connotations?far?above?curriculum?development.??Issues?of?classroom?control?and?development?of?scholarly?talents?are?at?stake,?not?simply?a?debate?over?which?books?are?acceptable?or?over?revisionist?histories.?

The?statement?itself?is?a?bit?misleading?in?that?in?my?experience,?student?control?over?curriculum?hardly?existed.??Each?year,?there?were?certain?course?offerings?made?available,?and?students?were?to?choose?from?those?offerings,?of?course?bearing?in?mind?requirements?for?graduation?set?forth?by?the?administration.??On?a?classroom?level,?the?immediate,?initial?material?may?have??been?somewhat?directed?by?the?students,?but?this?was?a?part?of?the?process?allowed?by?the?teacher/professor?in?order?to?gain?the?interest?and?attention?of?the?students.??However,?too?much?of?any?one?thing?becomes?problematic;?letting?students?set?the?curriculum,?as?with?letting?students?choose?and?design?their?own?major?in?college,?serves?ultimately?to?dilute?the?quality?of?the?educational?experience?unless?a?single?advisor?can?devote?significant?amounts?of?time?to?the?individual?student.??This?amount?of?time,?or?even??the?expense?to?the?student?of?this?individual?attention,?seem?to?indicate?that?resources?would?be?better?allocated?elsewhere.?

Of?course,?any?school?in?which?the?students?decide?"what?goes"?is?bound?to?have?problems?controlling?students.??Once?the?educators,?be?they?administrators?or?teachers,?are?under?the?control?of?students,?even?a?democratic?situation?would?be?like?holding?royalty?acountable?to?the?mob.?Presently,?students?hear?for?hours?that?they?should?not?forget?to?use?a?condom?in?the?heat?of?the?moment,?and?educators?think?the?message?gets?through,??while?half?the?kids?can't?even?remember?to?bring?a?pencil?to?class.???Students?go?to?school?not?to?simply?learn?the?Pythagorean?theorem,?but?to?learn?direction?and?receive?guidance.?This?cannot?occur?when?students?are??in?charge,?and?standards,?already?hard?to?find?in?America's?contemporary?public?schools,??will?become?unenforceable.??If?students?dictate?and?administrators?do,?students?will?never?learn?academic?responsibility,?and?if?they?can't?be?held?accountable?for?homework,?what?other?responsibilities?will?they?avoid?when?they?get?older?

But?in?another?sense,?teachers?and?students?do?exist?in?a?partnership?of?sorts.??Teachers?are?there?to?satisfy?the?needs?of?the?student,?and?the?student,?while?perhaps?not?being?the?most?experienced/?knowledgeable?person??on?what?his/her?needs?actually?are?(versus?wants),?at?least?should?be?afforded?some?say.???In?addition,?we?must?remember?what?the?purpose?of?education?is,?and?that?there?are?different?levels?of?education.?　??

In?high?school,?the?focus?is?not?so?much?on?learning?actual?material.??The?focus?is?on?developing?study?habits,?and?on?social?interaction.??The?best?secondary?schools?promote?an?environment?in?which?individual?creativity?and?pacing?can?be?developed,?where?students?are?taught?to?thinkon?their?own,?and?learn?to?debate?and?argue?in?a?scholarly?way,?through?writing?and?other?formal?methods?of?discourse.??Group?collaboration?and?interpersonal?skills?are?developed?and?honed.??The?actual?details?of?what?is?studied?and?tested?is?of?less?importance.??Whether?a?student?reads?Maya?Angelou,?or?Yeats,?or?Euripides?essentially?is?beside?the?point?as?long?as?a?student's?mind?is?cultivated,?not?just?their?ability?to?record?and?recite.??What?is?important?is?that?secondary?students?develop?and?grow?in?the?hands?of?the?professionals.?

The?secondary?educational?experience?is?designed?to?prepare?a?student?for?college.??It?is?in?college?where?the?individual?learns?to?examine?the?world?and?how?it?works,?and?the?individual's?place?in?it.?

As?for?duty,?it?is?the?educators'?duty?not?simply?to?determine?the?curriculum,?but?to?present?it?effectively.??They?cannot?half-heartedly?paint?it?on?the?blackboard,?they?must?enliven?it?and?actually?teach.??Hard?work?must?be?lauded,?while?freeloaders?are?punished.??These?are?the?duties?of?teachers,?and?the?duty?of?the?students?is?not?just?to?learn?or?study,?but?to?grow.?An?independent?mind?is?what?students?need,?and?that?mind?has?to?be?in?a?position?to?want?and?be?able?to?question?beyond?the?material?presented,?not?simply?to?question?its?legitimacy.?That?distinction,?though?subtle,?is?the?difference?between?letting?the?students?follow?a?self-destructive?course?of?premature?self-determination?on?the?one?hand?,?and?permitting?on?the?other?hand?the?fostering?of?great?talents?through?a?cooperative,?mentoring?relationship??

COMMENTARY?

This?is?an?insightful,?well-articulated?discussion?of?curricular?responsibility?and?the?larger?issue?of?academic?responsibility.??After?a?brief?introduction?examining?assumptions?implied?by?the?topic,?the?writer?skillfully?develops?the?position?that?letting?students?dictate?the?curriculum?could?dilute?the?educational?experience.??Allowing?students?to?determine?the?curriculum,?the?writer?claims,?will?deny?them?the?guidance?and?direction?they?need?to?learn?academic?responsibility.??

The?line?of?reasoning?is?strengthened?by?the?discussion?of?how?teachers?and?students?can?work?in?partnership?to?satisfy?the?needs?of?students.??The?argument?is?further?advanced?with?concrete?examples?from?high?school?courses?showing?how?teachers?provide?guidance?for?students?through?group?collaboration,?development?of?interpersonal?skills,?and?preparation?for?college.??The?examples?are?varied?(from?condom?use?to?reading?Angelou,?Yeats,?or?Euripedes)?and?used?effectively?to?further?support?the?writer's?position.?　??

In?the?conclusion,?the?writer?thoughtfully?discusses?how?educators?should?not?only?determine?the?curriculum?but?present?it?in?an?enlivened?and?appropriate?manner.??The?final?sentence,?contrasting?a?"self-destructive?course?of?premature?self-determination"?and?"a?cooperative,?mentoring?relationship,"?ties?the?essay?together.???

The?essay?is?clearly?organized,?although?the?writer?does?not?rely?on?conventional?phrases?(such?as?"first,"?"second,"?etc.)?to?signal?the?organizational?structure.??Instead,?the?organization?and?focus?progress?through?the?line?of?reasoning?that?moves?fluently?and?coherently?from?one?paragraph?to?the?next.?

Language?use?is?generally?precise?and?effective?(e.g.,?"holding?royalty?accountable?to?the?mob"),?and?sentence?structure?is?well?controlled?(e.g.,?"hard?work?must?be?lauded,?while?freeloaders?are?punished").??The?few?errors?are?minor,?the?kind?that?can?easily?be?made?--?and?forgiven?--?under?testing?conditions.?

This?outstanding?response?received?a?score?of?6.

GRE寫作滿分范文3

"It?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?place?so?much?emphasis?on?finding?out?what?students?want?to?include?in?the?curriculum?and?then?giving?it?to?them.??It?is?the?educator's?duty?to?determine?the?curriculum?and?the?students'?duty?to?study?what?is?presented?to?them."?

As?an?elementary?educator,?I?believe?this?stance?is?extremist.??Educators?and?the?public?must?come?to?a?middle?road.??The?high?road?and?the?low?road?are?intimated?in?this?statement.??I?believe?the?high?road?on?this?topic?(from?whence?should?curriculum?come)?represents?a?nouveau?approach.??Ask?the?students?what?they?want?to?learn?and?study?for?the?year;?then?meander,?research?and?branch?off?of?their?interests.??The?low?road?on?this?topic?(directly?endorsed?by?this?statement)?is?old?fashioned?and?outdated.??The?assumptions?behind?this?view?include?a?magical?ability?by?teachers?to?infuse?reams?of?information,?data?and?knowledge?into?students'?brains?that?then?become?internalized?and?applied?by?the?students.?

In?a?complex?and?frightening?society,?we?must?look?to?the?middle?road.??We?must?infuse?the?best?of?the?high?and?the?low?roads.??Current?research?has?had?a?lot?to?say?on?curriculum?development.??Overreaching?arguments?defend?the?quality?of?students'?self-directed?learning.??However,?in?order?to?prepare?our?students?for?this?society,?we?must?have?developed?the?backbone?and?anchor?for?curriculum.??Content?and?performance?standards?(i.e.?curricula)?need?to?be?developed?by?the?district's?educators?as?a?map?for?teachers.?When?educators?provide?students?with?choices?WITHIN?the?map?of?curriculum,?students?relish?in?the?freedom?and?take?ownership?for?their?learning.?

Were?we?to?provide?students?the?ultimate?authority?in?curriculum?development,?we?would?be?doing?an?injustice?not?only?to?our?students?but?to?society?as?a?whole.??There?are?specific?skills?and?abilities?that?need?to?be?developed?and?taught?--?regardless?of?students'?(or?for?that?matter,??teachers')?interest.??In?my?profession?as?an?elementary?educator?and?as?a?parent,?I?value?the?abilities?to?read,?write?and?be?mathematically?proficient.??Those?students?not?mastering?those?critical?skills?are?at?a?disadvantage.??We?see?those?students?become?destructive?or?depressed.??I?have?observed?students?struggling?with?the?basics?become?outcasts?in?their?own?little?worlds.??Very?young?outcasts?grow?into?adult?outcasts.?

I?do?NOT?think?it?is?unfortunate?that?today's?educators?emphasize?students'?interests.??It?IS?our?duty,?however,?to?provide?the?parameters?for?their?education.??We?can?not?simply?state?that?educators?determine?curriculum?and?students?follow.??This?is?just?not?reality?in?the?classrooms.??When?standards?and?curricular?maps?have?been?developed,?teachers?of?today's?children?have?the?responsibility?(yes,?the?duty!)?to?bring?life?to?those?maps.??One?crucial?and?successful?way,?is?to?provide?students?variety?and?choices?within?the?context?of?"what?needs?to?be?covered."??The?educator?who?brings?curricula?to?life?for?her?students?and?gives?her?students?the?responsibility?to?make?choices?helps?to?prepare?our?children?for?thriving?--?not?just?surviving.?

COMMENTARY?

This?response?presents?a?well-developed?analysis?of?the?issue?and?displays?strong?control?of?the?elements?of?writing.??The?essay?argues?in?favor?of?a?"middle?road"?position?on?the?issue?by?analyzing?the?pros?and?cons?of?both?teacher-determined?and?student-driven?curricula.??The?argument?is?clear?and?well?focused,?supported?with?first-hand?experience?and?the?results?of?educational?research.?

The?writer?endorses?a?curriculum?that?emphasizes?strong?basic?skills?(reading,?writing,?and?math)?and?reminds?the?reader?that?the?teachers'?ultimate?responsibility?should?be?to?bring?curricula?to?life?in?order?to?"prepare?our?children?for?thriving?--?not?just?surviving."?

This?essay?displays?a?strong?facility?with?written?English?language;?the?careful?choice?of?words?and?carefully?structured?paragraphs?help?unify?the?structure?of?the?argument.??Overall,?this?response?displays?a?strong?command?of?academic?writing?skills?and?thus?received?a?score?of?5.?

GRE寫作例子全方位匯總相關(guān)文章：

★ GRE寫作5.5分經(jīng)驗(yàn)分享

★ 各類英語(yǔ)考試作文大全

★ 為什么我的GRE作文只有3分?突破寫作分?jǐn)?shù)瓶頸你需要先解決這些問(wèn)題

★ GRE閱讀寫作用意題怎么答