雅思寫作高分語法結(jié)構(gòu)分析

　　狀語前置就是把一個(gè)修飾動(dòng)詞的狀語結(jié)構(gòu)，如介詞短語，分詞形式或動(dòng)詞不定式引導(dǎo)的短語放到句首。雅思寫作中狀語前置是很拿分的句式，不過很多考生都沒意識(shí)到這一點(diǎn)。下面是小編為您收集整理的雅思寫作高分語法結(jié)構(gòu)分析，供大家參考!

　　雅思寫作高分語法結(jié)構(gòu)分析

　　1. 狀語前置

　　請(qǐng)看下面從劍橋提供的范文中節(jié)選的句子：

　　1) Like self-awareness,this is also very difficult to achieve,but I think these are the two factors that may be the most important for achieving happiness.

　　2) Throughout the century,the largest quantity of water was used for agricultural purposes.

　　3) With a population of 176 million,the figures for Brazil indicate how high agricultural water consumption can be in some countries.

　　使用狀語前置的最大優(yōu)點(diǎn)是讓單調(diào)的句子有了跳躍的節(jié)奏感?？脊僖惶炜瓷习?gòu)埧季恚吹竭@樣的句子也會(huì)心情愉悅。

　　注意：插入語

　　此種語法結(jié)構(gòu)是可以理解為是狀語前置的另一種變體，它將狀語結(jié)構(gòu)提到了主句的主語和謂語之間。插入語也是相對(duì)地道的英語表達(dá)方法。請(qǐng)看以下幾例：

　　1) Universities,when it is functioning well,should offer both theoretical knowledge as well as professional training.

　　2) So overall,I believe that,attending school from a young age is good for most children.

　　語的功能和狀語前置基本相似，都能使句子更有跳躍感和地道。

　　雅思寫作高分語法結(jié)構(gòu)分析

　　2. 倒裝句

　　我們先來看以下幾個(gè)例子：

　　1) The parents should spend time on their children,they should also communicate with them.

　　2) We can never lose sight of the significance of education.

　　以上兩句話都沒有任何錯(cuò)誤，但是讀來非常平淡，沒有任何特色，如果我們用倒裝句，出來的效果就完全不一樣了。

　　1) Not only should parents spend time on their children,they are also advised to interact with them.

　　2) On no account / by no means / in no way can we lose sight of the significance of education.

　　當(dāng)然在平時(shí)教學(xué)和備課的過程中我們還是要不斷積累各式各樣的倒裝句句式進(jìn)行替換，靈活運(yùn)用。

　　雅思寫作高分語法結(jié)構(gòu)分析

　　3. 強(qiáng)調(diào)句

　　It is… that… / It is… who…正是…導(dǎo)致了

　　以下是考官寫的一句話：

　　1. It is the interaction of the two that shapes a person‘s personality and dictates how that personality develops.

　　強(qiáng)調(diào)句是考生比較難把握的一種句型，容易和it引導(dǎo)的形式主語相混淆，但其實(shí)我們只要找到強(qiáng)調(diào)句的一個(gè)特點(diǎn)，即去掉It is… that… / It is… who…仍然是一個(gè)完整的句子。

　　通過以上三種句式結(jié)構(gòu)的介紹，考生就能輕松給簡(jiǎn)單句穿上外衣進(jìn)行包裝了，這樣表達(dá)同樣的意思用不同的句式結(jié)構(gòu)，出來的效果完全不一樣。在筆者平時(shí)在朗閣課堂的教學(xué)中，這幾個(gè)句型幫助學(xué)生突破了如何寫好句子的瓶頸。下面我們來看一句話分別用不同的三種表達(dá)方法，明顯改變了效果。

　　中文： 二十世紀(jì)末科技的繁榮，人們開始廣泛使用電腦。

　　1) witness 句型

　　The late 20th century witnessed the prosperity in science and technology， thereby giving rise to the wide application of computers.

　　2) With結(jié)構(gòu)狀語前置

　　With the prosperity in science and technology in the late 20th century， the computers were widely applied.

　　3) 倒裝句

　　So flourishing was the science and technology in the late 20th century that computers were widely applied in various fronts.

　　4) 強(qiáng)調(diào)句型

　　It was the prosperity in science and technology in the late 20th century that gave rise to the wide application of computers.

　　雅思寫作7分范文 把握整體結(jié)構(gòu)

　　這篇雅思寫作范文的主要內(nèi)容是大學(xué)研究生比他們學(xué)歷低的人掙的錢多是很正常的，但是他們同時(shí)應(yīng)該為他們的學(xué)習(xí)擔(dān)負(fù)全部的花費(fèi)。你同意這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)嗎?

　　It is right that college graduates earn higher salaries than the less well-educated in the community. But they should also pay the full cost of their study. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

　　Some conclude that college students should bear total expenses for their higher learning on the generalization that college graduates usually receive higher salaries for similar jobs than those without a college degree. We cannot deny that higher level of education, indeed, does associate with better income. Still, built on such fact alone, the conclusion remains questionable.

　　The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case that people with higher education make more money than those less well-educated. But salary or income is, in most cases, based on contributions made by employees to companies or organizations in which they work for. Statistics in the labor market indicate that people with professional training tend to find jobs easier than college graduates do and that blue-collar workers who do not hold college degrees are becoming the hotties in the labor market. Employers prefer to hire and pay more to highly skilled and specially trained people rather than fresh college graduates. In the auto industry, for instance, skilled technicians make two or three times more than their college educated counterparts who make the average salaries in other companies. And it is widely accepted that people’s income is determined more by talent, hard work, and willingness to take risks than solely by certain qualifications such as college education. Otherwise, the unemployment rate of college graduates would not be increasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of power in controlling the labor market. Admittedly in some knowledge extensive field such as research, teaching, and practice of law the labor force are primarily consists of highly educated professionals. But such people make up only a fraction of the labor market and are thus unrepresentative of the whole employment in general.

　　Considering the goal of education, we find that it is even more problematic for the country to throw all the responsibility of financing college education to college students. The goal of higher education of a nation is to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of its labor force, thereby increasing the competency of the nation in the global economy. As tax payers, parents all contributes to the education system and country in various ways. It is only reasonable and necessary that the country gives some forms of financially assistance to students to ease the burden of rising education costs. Such help should go not only to students from needy or impoverished families but also to outstanding students from affluent backgrounds. Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children from millions of families to engage in higher level of study. It is understandable that the general quality of people in a country will improve and its economy will benefit both now and in years to follow.

　　If the burden of supporting children’s higher education is dumped on parents and students, thousands of brilliant students will be deprived of chances to pursue their academic inspiration. Among those who suffer would definitely be future great scientists, business managers, artists and statesmen. The loss will be disastrous and irreversible.

　　In conclusion, the idea that students should also pay the full cost of their study is wrong and harmful because it is wrong to assume that higher education necessarily equalize high income. Moreover, it is in the best interest of a nation to take responsibility in financing college education so that the goal of higher education will be better met.