托福綜合寫(xiě)作中有哪些要求?我們又該如何去注意這些要求?而這些要求又該怎么去解決?下面是小編給大家?guī)?lái)的詳解有關(guān)托福綜合寫(xiě)作的要求，希望能幫到大家!希望大家看完后做到心中有數(shù)!

　　詳解有關(guān)托福綜合寫(xiě)作的要求

　　我們知道，在托?？荚嚨墓俜街改现刑岬剑诳忌淖魑闹行枰?tīng)力材料中的具體觀(guān)點(diǎn)和以及采用怎么樣的方式對(duì)觀(guān)點(diǎn)進(jìn)行解釋和說(shuō)明。

　　從上面的要求來(lái)看，托福寫(xiě)作的考官們希望在托福綜合寫(xiě)作的作文中能夠?qū)⒙?tīng)力材料中的觀(guān)點(diǎn)作為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，詳細(xì)并清晰的表述其與閱讀材料的異同點(diǎn)。這一要求是綜合寫(xiě)作的重點(diǎn)，托?？荚嚬俜街改现性诿鞔_提出高分作文(4-5分)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)需要考生必須完整并正確的分析了聽(tīng)力和閱讀材料中所有的相應(yīng)觀(guān)點(diǎn)，也即所謂的“踩點(diǎn)給分”。這也就是我們說(shuō)抓住關(guān)鍵信息點(diǎn)是托福綜合寫(xiě)作的要求的原因?？忌挥凶プ「鱾€(gè)關(guān)鍵的信息點(diǎn)，才能在之后的閱讀中找到相對(duì)應(yīng)的觀(guān)點(diǎn)，然后再在寫(xiě)作中加以分析，闡述。

　　綜上所述，我們建議各位考生要在托福綜合寫(xiě)作中善于抓住聽(tīng)力材料的關(guān)鍵的信息點(diǎn)。要注意在一開(kāi)始讀閱讀材料時(shí)就要預(yù)估可能會(huì)在聽(tīng)力材料中出現(xiàn)的信息點(diǎn)，在聽(tīng)材料的時(shí)候更要把握每一個(gè)相關(guān)的信息，做到“寧可錯(cuò)殺，絕不放過(guò)”。

　　另外，考生要注意的是，這里要大家抓住關(guān)鍵信息點(diǎn)的要求是完整并正確的，也就是說(shuō)要考生對(duì)關(guān)鍵信息的記錄清晰而明確，考生切忌在這里提出自己的觀(guān)點(diǎn)，或根據(jù)閱讀材料盲目臆斷聽(tīng)力中的觀(guān)點(diǎn)。

　　以上就是小編為大家?guī)?lái)的關(guān)于托福寫(xiě)作要求的文章，其實(shí)也是我們要注意的事項(xiàng)。其實(shí)考生只要抓住了聽(tīng)力材料中的關(guān)鍵信息點(diǎn)才能做到有信心去考試。

　　托福寫(xiě)作佳句

　　1. When asked about the ongoing uproar involving U.S. President Bill Clinton , most people say the affair involves a purely private matter . But many other people regard his actions as deplorable . I personally think the president committed impeachable offences .

　　當(dāng)被問(wèn)及對(duì)現(xiàn)在有關(guān)美國(guó)總統(tǒng)比爾·克林頓的沸沸揚(yáng)揚(yáng)的議論有什么看法時(shí)，大多數(shù)人認(rèn)為這種曖昧關(guān)系純屬私事。但是，還有很多人認(rèn)為他的行為應(yīng)當(dāng)受到譴責(zé)。我個(gè)人認(rèn)為總統(tǒng)犯了這些過(guò)錯(cuò)，應(yīng)該被指控。

　　2. When it comes to the increasing use of motor vehicles in Beijing , some people think that use should be limited . Others argue that the opposite is true . There is probably some truth to both arguments,but emission controls must be instituted regardless of the number of vehicles.

　　涉及北京機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)使用量增加這一問(wèn)題，有的人認(rèn)為應(yīng)該限制使用。另一些人持相反意見(jiàn)。也許雙方的觀(guān)點(diǎn)都有一定道理，但是，無(wú)論車(chē)輛多少，必須對(duì)廢氣排放實(shí)行控制。

　　3. There is a general debate nowadays about the problem of itinerant workers . Those who object to the rising migrant population argue that increasing numbers lead to rising crime rates and harm social stability . They believe that strict limits should be placed on migrants entering China ' s cities . But people who favor the influx of the cheap labor force , on the other hand , maintain that migrants are needed to support the massive urban infrastructure construction program .

　　目前，針對(duì)流動(dòng)工人的問(wèn)題展開(kāi)了普遍的爭(zhēng)論。反對(duì)流動(dòng)工人增加的人認(rèn)為這會(huì)導(dǎo)致犯罪率升高，從而危害社會(huì)穩(wěn)定。他們主張應(yīng)該嚴(yán)格限制進(jìn)入中國(guó)城市的流動(dòng)工人。但是，另一方面，支持廉價(jià)勞動(dòng)力流入的人主張，為了支持大規(guī)模的城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)規(guī)劃，流動(dòng)人口是必需的。

　　4. It is widely acknowledged that extensive deforestation contributed to heavy summer flooding . Experts argue that China must introduce a massive afforestation program . But I doubt whether afforestation alone will solve the problem .

　　人們普遍認(rèn)為過(guò)度砍伐造成了夏季特大洪水。專(zhuān)家認(rèn)為中國(guó)必須推行大規(guī)模的植樹(shù)造林計(jì)劃。但我對(duì)僅僅植樹(shù)造林就能解決問(wèn)題表示懷疑。

　　5. Most people are of the opinion that wealth provides solutions to all problems . But in spite of the material benefits wealth provides , I believe one should abandon the pursuit of materialism and instead concentrate on the pursuit of happiness .

　　大多數(shù)人認(rèn)為財(cái)富為所有問(wèn)題提供解決的辦法。但是，我認(rèn)為，盡管財(cái)富提供物質(zhì)上的利益，一個(gè)人應(yīng)該放棄物質(zhì)至上的追求，而是集中精力追求幸福。

　　6. Many people believe that capital punishment deters crime . But although criminologists have conducted exhaustive research regarding the subject , little evidence exists to support the claim .

　　很多人相信極刑能阻止犯罪。但是，雖然刑事學(xué)家就這一課題做了詳盡的研究，幾乎沒(méi)有證據(jù)能支持這種說(shuō)法。

　　7. An increasing number of people are joining the " Information Age " via the Internet . In reaction to the phenomenon , some say the Internet has removed barrters and provided people with immediate access to the world . But do they raelize that rapidly advancing information technology can also lead to intrusions of privacy ?

　　越來(lái)越多的人通過(guò)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)進(jìn)入了“信息時(shí)代”。針對(duì)這一現(xiàn)象，一些人認(rèn)為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)消除了障礙，為人們提供了與世界即時(shí)鏈接的途徑。但是，他們有沒(méi)有意識(shí)到迅速發(fā)展的信息技術(shù)也能導(dǎo)致侵犯隱私?