雅思寫作范文匯總

　　雅思作文是雅思考試中較為重要的一個(gè)部分，雅思備考時(shí)，作文的備考是必不可少的，下面是學(xué)習(xí)啦為大家提供的雅思小作文范文，供大家參考。

　　雅思寫作范文一

　　In order to learn a language well, we should also learn about the country as well as the cultures and lifestyles of the people who speak it.

　　To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　我完全贊成這個(gè)斷言，即：要學(xué)好一門語言，我們還應(yīng)該了解這門語言的國家、文化和人民的生活方式。

　　I fully support the assertion that to learn a language well, we should also learn about the country as well as the cultures and lifestyles of the people who speak it.

　　先來看看我們一般情況下是如何定義“真正學(xué)好一門語言”的。按照我的理解，學(xué)好一門語言意味著能夠妥當(dāng)?shù)厥褂盟?。這里，對(duì)于妥當(dāng)使用它而言，我們需要知道：由于文化上的差異，很多東西會(huì)因此而非常不同。比如，中國人常通過問“吃了嗎?”來表達(dá)問候，而這對(duì)于西方人來講便構(gòu)成了午飯或晚飯的邀請(qǐng)。因此，缺乏了對(duì)不同國家文化方面的知識(shí)，就會(huì)引起對(duì)所發(fā)送或接收到的信息的錯(cuò)誤理解，結(jié)果便會(huì)導(dǎo)致誤解。這樣一來，我們就不能說我們講得妥當(dāng)，再進(jìn)一步，我們就不能說我們講得好。

　　Let’s first see how we normally define “learning a language really well”. By my understanding, learning a language well would mean being able to speak the language in a proper way. Here, with speaking it properly, we need to know that due to cultural differences, many things are just so different from culture to culture. For example, the Chinese often greet each other by asking ‘Have you taken your meal?’ which, to the Western ears, would make an invitation to lunch or dinner. Therefore, the lack of a knowledge of the cultures of different countries will give rise to wrong interpretations of the message issued or received and as a result, lead to misunderstandings. In this way, we can not say that we are speaking the language properly and further, we can not say that we speak it well.

　　第二，我們學(xué)習(xí)一門語言的最終目的是用它與講這門語言的人進(jìn)行交流，主要就是母語為這門語言的人。設(shè)想我們對(duì)美國或英國什么也不了解，包括其政府、人民、傳統(tǒng)以及其它方面，你想你能妥當(dāng)?shù)刂v英語，從而與美國人或英國人達(dá)到有效的交流嗎?我要說：至少我是做不到的。

　　Second, the ultimate purpose for us to learn a language is to use it in our communication with other people who speak it, mainly the native speakers. Suppose we know nothing about the US or Britain, including its government, its people, its tradition, and its other aspects. Do you think you can speak English properly, thus achieving effective communication with the American or British people? I’ll say at least I can’t.

　　第三，我們還需要知道我們所學(xué)語言國家的人民的生活方式才能妥當(dāng)?shù)刂v他們的語言。舉個(gè)例子吧：中國人吃豬肉，但穆斯林不吃。還有，穆斯林宗教氣氛濃郁，每天多次舉行儀式。如果我們不知道這些事情的話又怎能指望與他們交流而不招致麻煩呢?按照這一邏輯，如果我們不能保證妥當(dāng)?shù)刂v好他們的語言，我們又怎么說他們的語言我們學(xué)得很好呢?

　　Third, the lifestyle of the people whose language we are learning is also something we need to know in order that we can speak their language properly. For instance, the Chinese eat pork, but this is not the case with Muslims. Also, Muslims are very religious people and perform rituals many times a day. If we don’t know these things, how can we expect to communicate with them without incurring troubles? In this logic, if we cannot make sure that we are speaking their language properly, how can we say that we have learned their language well?

　　由此，我們可以得出結(jié)論了：學(xué)好一門語言，我們還必須了解這個(gè)國家以及這個(gè)國家的文化和其人民的生活方式。

　　From the above discussion, we can draw the conclusion that to learn a language really well, we also need to learn about the country as well as the cultures and lifestyles of the people who speak it.

　　雅思寫作范文二

　　Many old building are protected by law because they are part of a nation's history. However，some people think knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

　　Old buildings sometimes conflicts with social advancement. Appealing as it is in the eyes of business people，tearing down old architect to make room for real-estate development is not a wise idea in many ways.

　　The primarily reason is that old buildings，like our native language，forms our cultural identity and keep a unique record the history of a country. From this aspect，old buildings are considered very valuable as one of the symbols of the culture of a nation. For instance，the traditional Chinese residence in Beijing，Siheyuan，are once seen as the remains of the Old World，and were destroyed by people shortly after the founding of People's Republic of China. Until recently did the people and policy makers as well realize that it is an inexcusable and stupid idea to commit such a terrible deed because old buildings，once gone，are not restorable. But their economic values and aesthetic appeals have just caught the attention of Chinese people.

　　Moreover，old buildings，if planed and preserved properly，could coexist with modern real-estate development. In France，aged buildings bring millions of dollars of revenue for the government and amazed thousands of tourists. Yet no one thinks the high-rising office buildings and apartment buildings make the old architect a sore of the eye. By contrast，the new learn from the old，a fact that makes them more attractive.

　　We admit that not all old buildings should be treated equally and some of them do need to be torn down for various reasons such as safety and new buildings. However，we should not be too blind to see their value too. If only the real and practical factors are being considered，the country will be sorry for its loss in years to come.

　　As we have discussed，old buildings are part of a country's history and are valuable in many ways. We should plan well and be wise enough to see their value. But the same time，we should also do our best to find solutions to make the old and the new coexist in harmony.

　　延伸閱讀：雅思寫作8分范文

　　小編導(dǎo)讀：以下是范文的中英文對(duì)照版，考生可以從中多多學(xué)習(xí)。

　　Some people believe that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Others believe there are other factors. Discuss the two sides and give your opinion.

　　對(duì)幸福的追求一直都是人類世世代代的夢(mèng)想，盡管人類一直困惑于幸福的真諦。幸福是什么?幸福和經(jīng)濟(jì)的成功有密切聯(lián)系嗎?個(gè)人經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功能夠直接帶來幸福嗎?就個(gè)人而言，我不認(rèn)為經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功是人類幸福的唯一前提。

　　The pursuit of happiness has long been the dream of generations of human beings. They have always been puzzled by the essence of happiness. What is happiness? Is it closely related to one's economic success? Will one's financial success lead to happiness directly? Personally, I don't agree that one's economic success is the only prerequisite of one's happiness in life.

　　幸福有很多種。俗話說得好，“一個(gè)人的美食可能是另一個(gè)人的毒藥”。幸福可能意味著成為一個(gè)成功的受人尊敬的領(lǐng)袖，或是一份穩(wěn)定舒適的大型跨國公司的工作，又或是市區(qū)的大房子、一套漂亮的家具等等。然而，幸福也可以是一個(gè)和諧平靜的家庭，或是一個(gè)體貼熱情的朋友，或者只是一個(gè)微笑、一個(gè)手勢(shì)、一個(gè)暗示。事實(shí)上，幸?？梢允悄隳軌蛳氲降娜魏问虑?。至少，我們可以有兩種幸福：精神幸福和物質(zhì)幸福。

　　Happiness may fall into different categories. An old saying goes like this: “One man's meat is another man's poison”. Happiness may mean being a successful and respected leader of a company, or a stable and comfortable job in a large international company, or a big flat downtown, a fantastic set of furniture, etc. However, happiness can also be a harmonious and peaceful family, or a hospitable and considerate friend, or just a smile, a gesture, a hint. In fact, happiness may be composed of anything you could ever think of. At least, we may have two types of happiness: spiritual happiness and materialistic happiness.

　　一方面，一個(gè)人的物質(zhì)幸福依賴于經(jīng)濟(jì)上的成功，盡管不是完全依賴。沒有穩(wěn)定的經(jīng)濟(jì)后盾，很難想象如何過上輕松簡單的生活，更不用說富庶奢侈的生活了。如果買不起房子、車，甚至是一本書，任何人提到這種生活都會(huì)害怕。當(dāng)然，有一些人只要基本的生活需求得到滿足就可以立刻感到很幸福。但是我們?nèi)匀槐仨毘姓J(rèn)，這些人也需要某種意義上的經(jīng)濟(jì)成功。

　　One's materialistic happiness is dependant on one's economic success, though not completely. Without a strong and steady economic background, one could never imagine an easy and simple life, let alone an affluent and luxurious one. If you aren't able to afford a house, a car, or even a book, anybody would be horrified at the mere mention of this kind of life. Definitely, some people will feel happy right away if their basic demands for life are satisfied. However, we have to admit that these people still need to be successful materialistically to some degree.

　　雅思寫作范文三

　　Unlike other countries, police in UK do not carry guns. Some think it leaves citizen unprotected, others think it reduce the overall violence in the society. Please discuss.

　　At the mention of a policeman, most people will have in their mind the image of a strong man or woman with a gun on his belt. But it is not the case in UK: police there do not carry guns. People’s opinions towards this vary.

　　Some people think this contributes to the decrease of violence in society. For one thing, when a robber sees a policeman pointing a gun at him, he may get exasperated and desperate and, out of despair, he may hurt people around him. If the policeman does not carry a gun, nothing of the kind will happen. For another, to err is human and no one can guarantee that a policeman does not mis-shoot the pedestrians when he is hurriedly chasing a criminal. Lastly, some policemen have committed serious crimes with the guns they had.

　　However, other people hold different views: police without guns leave citizens unprotected. To begin with, at critical moments, guns in policemen’s hands can be essential in fighting against the criminals. Imagine a bank robber pointing a gun at the head of a hostage. A policeman can hardly do anything about it if he does not carry a gun. However, the situation can be totally reversed otherwise. Moreover, policemen are well-trained and thus rarely hurt innocent people with their guns.

　　As far as I am concerned, the latter is more favorable. To my mind, policemen are the very few people on earth who should carry guns, with which they can effectively protect the citizens. (283 words)